Essays / Exhibition news / Publications

Raccolta da un Esilio - ATB Gallery

Settembre 17 - Ottobre 5 / Via Riccardo Sineo 10 / Torino

Galleria fotografica dalla vernissage e una fantastica recensione critica di Alessandro Allocco, fondatore di ATB.

le opere in mostra: Choice Material (2021), Bums on Seats, The Dilemma, First Past the Post, A Coincidentalist Work (2020), 14 Exposures (2018)

di Alessandro Allocco

Puro significato, pura materia, povertà del soggetto, ma ricchezza infinita di un "credo" fortissimo: il cambiamento dell'arte.

"Raccolta da un esilio" è il lavoro, frutto di un'appassionata ricerca di Sam Vickers, esposto presso ATB Associazione Cultuale. E un esperimento di "non-arte come arte" nell'era dei social media,. Una serie di opere interattive baste sul tempo e sulla scelta dei materiali che trovano la loro ragion d'essere tra la vacuità concettuale e valore materiale in costante fluidità di significato pregna o scevra di valore affettivo a seconda che rientri o meno in una tendenza di mercato (di per sé privo di phatos, sensibile solo alle logiche economiche). Le opere di Sam Vickers traducono visivamente la voglia di dare al modo di percepire l'arte, un segno di cambiamento effettivo attraverso concetti coerenti ispirati dai social. In questa sua crociata in "esilio", l'artista britannico rinnova un linguaggio pittorico con la raffinatezza della materia provocatoriamente trasformata solo dal tempo. Le opere in esposizione, materiche e social, sono una concreta affermazione di stile dell'artista britannico. Sam Vickers ricerca l'avanguardia nel XXI secolo, come già fecero molti suoi colleghi artisti nel XX da Fontana a Burri, attraverso la tendenza a riconoscere un significato fondamentale alla materia non più subordinato all'immagine che si vuole rappresentare, in quanto è la materia stessa protagonista dell'opera.

 Artisti del Neodadaismo come Rauschenberg, Johns, e Nevelson oppure dell'Arte Informale come appunto Burri, Milani, Somaini o addirittura del gruppo Gutai rientrano nella cerchia dei sostenitori della "materia", ma già nel precedente Surrealismo e Futurismo possiamo riscontrare grande interesse che avvalorerà quest'importante corrente artistica.

I primi quadri materici vennero realizzati con chiari intenti provocatori di denuncia sociale: violenti strappi, inquietanti sfondi neri o accozzaglie di tessuti senza una forma precisa, ma con simboli inerenti al contesto storico, gioielli dal fascino innegabile che suscitano curiosità e interesse. "Raccolta da un esilio", affronta una complessa questione: la non-arte è arte? Questo concetto non è nuovo anche se, nel nostro mondo occidentale odierno, la scissione tra Arte e non-arte è piuttosto recente. C'è una lunga storia legata al "quotidiano" -in particolar modo con il pensiero modernista- in cui il mondano sublima in quella "carica creativa" tipica del linguaggio artistico contemporaneo. Le opere di Sam Vickers in esposizione sostengono "un approccio culturale e olistico, soprattutto non etnocentrico, nella delineazione del processo di costruzione delle idee, delle pratiche e delle istituzioni delle arti..." (Larry Shiner in The invention of Art. A Cultural History 2001).

Il concetto di non-arte come arte si collega alle nuove e migliorate condizioni sociali del nostro opulento occidente, che hanno stimolato nuovi gusti e concezioni estetiche in verità dissimili rispetto alle realizzazioni accademiche del passato: nuovi luoghi nei quali fare esperienza e discutere di poesia, di pittura o musica strumentale al di fuori delle loro tradizionali funzioni sociali, luoghi fisici e virtuali, materiali e immateriali.

Il concetto di non-arte come arte non può prescindere dalla storia dell'arte attraverso la quale si percepisce che in ciò che la nostra cultura considera artistico c'è varietà di tempo, di luogo e di strato sociale come ben sottolineava Picasso che riconosceva l'arte in oggetti quotidiani, di lavoro o feticci provenienti dall'Africa o dall'Oceania (maschere rituali, bastoni, lance) e li innalzava a oggetti da museo. Aveva ragione perché, al di là del sistema di relazioni sociali che l'arte ha da sempre generato nella cultura e al di là dei diversi modi e stili di creatività formale, la dimensione estetica è sempre propria di ogni attività umana.

Il concetto di non-arte come arte è un elemento esperienziale comune e trasversale che interessa tutti gli strati sociali perché, in fondo, essere artisti è una caratteristica fondamentale della nostra specie, è bisogno e capacità codificata nella nostra memoria genetica, è necessità elementare dell'essere umano alla continua ricerca di appagamento, soddisfazione e agio, al di là della mera utilità.

Collected from an Exile - ATB Gallery

September 17 - October 5 / Via Riccardo Sineo 10 / Turin

Photo gallery of the private view and accompanying critical review by Alessandro Allocco, ATB founder.

Works on show: Choice Material (2021), Bums on Seats, First Past the Post, The Dilemma, A Coincidentalist Work (2020), 14 Exposures (2018)

by Alessandro Allocco

Pure meaning, pure matter, poverty of subject, but the infinite richness of a staunch belief in the change of art.

 "Collected from an exile" is the work and result of Sam Vickers’ passionate research, exhibited at the ATB Cultural Association. It is an experiment of "non-art as art" in the age of social media. A series of interactive works based on time and the choice of materials that find their raison d'etre between conceptual emptiness and material value in constant fluidity of meaning - either full or devoid of emotional value depending on whether or not it falls within a market trend (in itself devoid of phatos, sensitive only to economic logic). Sam Vickers' works visually translate the need of perceiving art as a sign of effective change through coherent concepts inspired by social media. On his crusade into "exile", the British artist renews a pictorial language with the refinement of the material provocatively transformed only by time. The works on display, both material and social, are a concrete statement of the British artist's style. Sam Vickers seeks the avant-garde in the 21st century, as many of his fellow artists did in the 20th from Fontana to Burri, through the tendency to recognize matter’s fundamental meaning - that is no longer subordinate to the image being represented, as it is the very same protagonist of the work.

  Neodadaist artists such as Rauschenberg, Johns, and Nevelson or of Informal Art such as Burri, Milani, Somaini or even the Gutai group, are part of the circle of “matter” supporters but we can also find considerable interest that confirms this important artistic current in Surrealism and Futurism.

The first material paintings were made with clear provocative intentions of social denunciation: violent tears, disturbing black backgrounds or jumbles of fabric without a precise shape, but with symbols inherent to the historical context, jewels of undeniable charm that arouse curiosity and interest. "Collected from an exile" addresses a complex question - is non-art art? This concept is not new even if, in our western world today, the split between art and non-art is quite recent. There is a long history linked to the "everyday" (especially within modernist thought) in which the mundane provides  that "creative charge" so typical of contemporary artistic language. Sam Vickers’ works on display support "a cultural and holistic approach, above all non-ethnocentric, in the delineation of the process of construction of the ideas, practices and institutions of the arts ..." (Larry Shiner, The invention of Art. A Cultural History 2001).

 

The concept of non-art as art is linked to the new and improved social conditions of our opulent West, which have stimulated new tastes and aesthetic conceptions that are actually dissimilar to the academic achievements of the past: new places in which to experience and discuss poetry, of instrumental painting or music outside their traditional social functions, physical and virtual places, material and immaterial.

Equally, the concept of non-art as art cannot disregard the history of art through which it is perceived, namely to understand what our culture considers artistic there is a variety of time, place and social strata to consider; as well underlined by Picasso, who recognized art in African and Oceanic everyday objects (for work or otherwise: ritual masks, sticks, spears) and raised them to museum object status. He was right because beyond the system of social relations that art has always generated in culture and beyond the different ways and styles of formal creativity, aesthetic dimension is always proper to every human activity.

The concept of non-art as art is a commonly experiential element that affects all social levels because, after all, being artists is a fundamental characteristic of our species, it is a need and capacity encoded into our genetic memory, it is an elementary necessity of human beings constantly looking for fulfillment, satisfaction and ease, beyond mere utility.

The habit of considering art distinct from what is not currently dominant art in the West, is spreading further into the rest of the world and collects peculiarities of one’s own life as an artist, of unique pieces, of unerring research and the authorship of wonder. All that is called art is a cosmopolitan phenomenon that globally connects not only the markets of aesthetic products, but also many (if not all) local aesthetic dimensions that are, more or less, already "contaminated" - often consciously and programmatically hybridized with non-art.

  The exhibition "Collected from an exile" by Sam Vickers welcomes the two sides of art and non-art as art and treats them as complementary attitudes towards traditions and post-modernity; also making them part of a complex framework of hybridizations between local traditions, mass culture, experimentalist elitism - in an intrinsically "postnational" dynamic.

 

 

IPA (6.5% concept art)

A day job is one of those stubbornly real aspects that, as an artist, you try to suppress (or at least try not to mention) as much as possible. Such a dirty word spoils the romantic image of an artist existing for their own work and very little else. It does however, remain an image that is pushed on us as students; that having the freedom, time and space to do whatever you want equals success amongst your peers. If you still indeed have a day job, then you are tainted and linger in the realm of failure - simply due to its very existence. It’s certainly the case that you just don’t hear about most of the crap jobs that most noted artists have done because most biographers conveniently forget to include them; perhaps the justification being that such ‘a means to an end’ is irrelevant and purely circumstantial.

Yet this short essay aims to explain that without the day job then “The Dilemma” would probably never have been made. “The Dilemma” is a recent, conceptual work that addresses language, or more specifically, the language of art. It consists of a short statement printed onto a transparent PVC sheet and is hung by two bulldog clips.

Over the last few months, I have been negotiating the ‘sound’ of spoken English with some of my students. At certain points I have found myself broaching the subject of phonetics to illustrate what I mean, the most obvious example being the schwa - a term that is relatively unknown to non- native speakers (or native ones for that matter). In the beginning it was a bit lost on them as to why most British people say “cuppa tea” instead of “cup of tea” but once I had explained that it’s mainly down to laziness (like most languages) they gradually understood it. In the International Phonetic Alphabet the schwa is represented by an upside down ‘e’ and after having drawn it dozens of times on a blackboard, I noticed that this type of text creates a slight conundrum:

If the IPA is supposed to help people with clarifying a language, then why does most of it look like complete nonsense?

There is a case to be made that this alphabet, by its very nature, doesn’t place any real significance in the words but I would argue that normal words can be just as empty. My point here being that the language of art (or what has become ‘International Art English’) is now so up itself that art essays, press releases and catalogues have been littered with portentous, loaded words for some time - the nouns being particularly culpable. I can’t say that I’m blameless in this matter; there have been times when I’ve written ‘entropic spaces’ and ‘non-states’ etc because it seems like you’re not taken seriously if you don’t use IAE. Art is a foggy subject already but it’s still quite fashionable to mystify it even further by using such terms. Just pick out any exhibition leaflet and I guarantee that you will find at least a dozen.

“The Dilemma” is a representation of how language is generally used in the art world and an example of how concept art is one of the more contentious, yet ultimately fascinating, forms of art. So I thought that it would be interesting to display a conceptual idea in IPA – a comment on ‘understandability’ if you will. Here follows a version of the printed text and a recorded translation in English:

ɪn ˈɔːdə tə meɪk ðə saʊndz əv wɜːdz mɔː ˈtænʤəbl, sʌm ˈpiːpl juːz ðɪs ˈmɛθəd. ɪt ˈʤɛnərəli sɜːvz əz ə gaɪd tə prəˌnʌnsɪˈeɪʃən bət ˈlɑːʤli əˈmɪts ðə ˈmiːnɪŋ əv ðə wɜːdz ðəmˈsɛlvz.


djuː tə ðə fækt
ðət ðɪs həz biːn ˈrɪtn aʊt əz sʌʧ kri(ː)ˈeɪts ðə ˈfɒləʊɪŋ dɪˈlɛmə:


həz ðɪs kənˈsɛptjʊəl ˈɑːtˌwɜːk biːn ˈrɛndəd ˈiːzɪə tʊ ˌʌndəˈstænd bɪˈkəz ɪt hæz, ɪn ə ˈsɜːtn weɪ, biːn spɛlt aʊt fə juː, ɔː həz ði aɪˈdɪə ˈmɪəli ˈdɪsɪpeɪtɪd ˈɪntə ə ˈsɪəriːz əv ˈlɛtəz ənd ˈsɪmbəlz ðæt, ət fɜːst glɑːns, meɪks ˈvɛri ˈlɪtl sɛns

Once I had changed this into IPA then the idea really did come alive. All the symbols that I recognised from teaching started to appear but because I had never really gone beyond one or two words in isolation before, the text just became an aesthetically pleasing mess.

So therein lies the joke. Artists and collectors use IAE on a daily basis but is really is style over substance, with the writer being the beneficiary of their own words. The back up joke lies with the fact that the statement is printed onto a transparent sheet, so are you rendering yourself invisible by using IAE or revealing yourself to be a fraud...? Maybe both.

If you’d like to find out more about IAE, then here’s a link to an excellent piece, written by A.Rule and D.Levine - produced by Triple Canopy.

 https://www.canopycanopycanopy.com/contents/international_art_english

“The Dilemma” follows another text based piece, the first being “A Coincidentalist Work”, made in tribute to John Baldessari, who remains a huge influence up to this very moment of typing. He was also a teacher (the biographers mention this one quite famously) and in many ways the professorial attitudes of being direct, personable and  ‘performative’ come through well in his text pieces- like the glaring immediacy of a teacher’s hand written note on a homework assignment.

Once I had thought of these ideas for my own work (either through a day job or not) I enjoyed wrestling with how funny they ought to be and furthermore, if conceptual statements like this offer little to the viewer apart from the artist’s own banal sense of self-awareness. I’m intrigued by the way that people sometimes roll their eyes at pieces like this; it signifies a level of understanding that it’s all too easy and breaks the stigma that is often attached to ‘unfathomable’ conceptual art. Sometimes making a point of stating the obvious isn’t such a bad thing.

Bums on seats dear boy! (Art in the Age of Analytics)

bums on seats banner.JPG

There’s an old saying in the English theatre business, “Bums on seats, dear boy, bums on seats”.

I heard it many times during my brief tenure as a spotlight operator some years ago, either in the auditorium itself, in the green room or after the show and I used to cringe every time someone uttered it. In any case it humoured me that this stereotype really did exist and that how such a comment on attendance rendered the quality of the actual show largely irrelevant. All that matters is how many people saw it.

The story, characterisation, music, lighting, script, backdrop etc- all crunched into a series of figures that can be looked back on as evidence of a hit once the run is over.

I am of course referring to if a show is in any way more popular than expected. If there are lots of people to see it each time, then in most people’s eyes, it’s considered a success; even if the production is awful and strewn with errors, “you can’t argue with the box office”. The added hype that circles around popularity has always been impossible to stop before it naturally ends up like a used ticket stub in a wet gutter somewhere.

I only mention this back story as a type of introductory allegory for what could be discerned these days as a by-product of the ‘attention culture’ and to broach the subject of this post.    

What is ‘attention culture’ and how did we get here? From my own perspective, artists have to compete with each other, let alone the general public and its difficult to say how long your ‘moment’ can last for; add to the story, add to the story, make it more goofy and irreverent so that everyone can see that you’re not a pretentious tosser.

Twenty four hours seems way too long in all honesty, it’s now down to mere seconds. It’s not just the creative industries either, anyone who publishes anything can become easily hooked on the rush that comes with grabbing someone else’s attention; stealing time from busy lives is essentially addictive…

I mainly speak of what social media has done to change our perception of what is considered as having the right kind of impact. I couldn’t count the number of times that I have fallen into the black hole of rolling news, dumb videos and other things far removed from what I initially logged on to do, just because I became quickly bored with it.

It seems quite vague as to why some things capture interest and others do not; how stuff becomes viral is anyone’s guess, most of the time it appears quite unintentional. The term ‘snowballing’ comes into this and can be achieved without a massive PR campaign.   

The universal ease of the Internet is a blessing for many, speaking as an artist in a socially restricted time but it is also a massive problem. People have always made art for sure but the way that it is recorded, delivered and discussed has completely changed over the last ten years or so; the limited life spans of social media networks and fanzines are certainly evident of an increasingly temporal frame of mind. The damage that digital saturation causes is a common theory and a well known issue but it also led me to think of a new piece that could ask questions about the attention culture.

Next week in Part Two- Conceptual Outline

A tribute to John Baldessari

No title

550 x 250 mm

Vinyl on polythene

Torino 2020

January 2nd brought the sad news that John Baldessari died at home in California aged 88. I have always considered him a huge influence, not just in terms of his varied subject matter and visual presentation but also of how he thought about art.

For the most part Baldessari’s work always carries a sense of humour which quickly eradicates any sense of pretension. You only have to look at works such as “The Pencil Story” (1972) to see this in action; also, in this instance, the very fact that the idea is written out instantly reveals the concept in a very succinct manner. (see source link below)

Furthermore, it is obvious to note that any other visual parts deemed unnecessary are deliberately avoided. Certainly an interesting decision on the grounds of how something is made; staying honest to the idea is often difficult, especially if time elapses between conception and final work.

The sensibility of Baldessari’s work (especially during the late 60s-early 70’s) goes beyond the conceptual angle into the realms of graphics and advertising. I see the similarities stemming from how publicity picks up on details, quirks and things that break up the rhythm of everyday life in order to garner attention. Is there any huge difference between concept art and advertising in that they are both subliminal? You could argue this case for any artwork but it seems more evident in works such as Baldessari’s.

On to the tribute work. The question of originality came up whilst I was producing The Coincidences Project some time ago; one offshoot from this (that was never fully explored) was how artworks may appear the same even if produced by two different people in two different places.

This line of inquiry was ripe for a ‘Baldessarian’ take, so introducing text back into the work was vital. The as yet untitled piece introduces the term ‘Coincidentalist’ as a joke on the many ‘ists’ and ‘isms’ that the art world uses to classify thought. In order to strengthen the message, I decided to minimalise the work to such a degree that even the base for the vinyl lettering (MasterType Roslyn) is transparent.

Has, in fact, another artist made this before I did and for the same reasons? It is definitely odd when you do stumble across something which asks the same questions or at the very least looks similar. There has always been a debate about originality in art and how artists try to ‘own’ their own style but what does it matter if you’re oblivious.

RIP John Baldessari 1931-2020

Source: https://www.tate.org.uk/tate-etc/issue-13-...